Calls for a national inquiry into grooming gangs grow louder amid public outrage
Oldham: The recent decision by Jess Phillips to reject a government-led inquiry into grooming gangs has stirred up quite a storm. People are really upset about it.
Elon Musk even jumped in, criticizing the safeguarding minister and suggesting she should face serious consequences for her stance. It’s wild how this has caught international attention.
Kemi Badenoch backed Musk, saying it’s high time for a thorough national inquiry into the grooming gangs issue. She pointed out that while trials have happened, no one seems to connect the dots. She believes 2025 should be the year victims finally see justice.
Readers of the Telegraph are voicing their frustration over Labour’s choice to skip a national inquiry. Many think it’s absurd to handle such a serious issue locally.
One reader, Paul Pennyfeather, expressed disbelief, asking how the exploitation of so many girls could be seen as just a local issue. It’s a sentiment shared by many.
Another anonymous reader chimed in, stressing that when it comes to serious crimes, it’s not just a local matter. They want to know why certain cases didn’t go forward.
Chris Hart shared his disgust, saying it’s insulting to suggest this is only a local problem. He feels it’s a disgrace for Labour and its leader, Sir Keir Starmer.
Debbie Skinner added that a national inquiry is crucial to uncover how deep the issues go. She believes leaving it to local councils won’t provide the necessary oversight.
Naveed Zafar expressed his shame and anger over the lack of a proper inquiry into the towns affected. He thinks those responsible for not prosecuting should be held accountable.
Some readers are questioning Labour’s priorities, comparing their inaction to the investigation into Partygate. One reader pointed out the absurdity of investigating a cake while ignoring the mass abuse of children.
Sir Keir Starmer found himself on the defensive, trying to justify his past actions as director of public prosecutions during the grooming gang crisis. His comments about those calling for an inquiry being “far-Right” didn’t sit well with many.
Jason Irwin was taken aback by Starmer’s remarks, saying anyone who labels concerned parents as far-Right isn’t fit for leadership. Others echoed this sentiment, feeling insulted by his comments.
Reader M.C. told Starmer that those asking for an inquiry are simply representing the public, which is his job as Prime Minister. They’re tired of his attempts to deflect blame.
In response to the renewed scandal, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans for longer prison sentences for child groomers. However, many feel this is too little, too late.
Reader Martin Hanson pointed out that offenders often get released early, questioning what real change this will bring. Others agree that without a full inquiry, many perpetrators will escape justice.
Margaret Chapman emphasized the need for tougher sentences but stressed that the real issue is the lack of prosecutions. She believes public inquiries are essential to address the failures of authorities.
Julie McCaughey supported Cooper’s call for an inquiry, stating that these crimes have been ignored for far too long. She believes accountability is crucial.
Guy Farrish added that it’s not just about sentencing; it’s about ensuring that those responsible for bringing these criminals to justice are held accountable.
For some, Cooper’s promises ring hollow. Reader Neil Scott expressed skepticism about her commitment to harsher sentences for serious offenders.
Another anonymous reader felt it was too late for meaningful action, criticizing the government for not acting sooner when it mattered most.
