The judge who awarded custody to Sara Sharif’s father will not be named, despite public outcry and concerns over transparency in family courts.
Woking: So, here’s the deal. The judge who gave custody of Sara Sharif to her dad, despite his violent past, is staying anonymous. This has sparked a lot of chatter.
Back in 2019, during a private Family Court hearing in Guildford, Urfan Sharif and his wife, Beinash Batool, got custody of little Sara. Fast forward four years, and the poor girl was found dead in her home, having endured horrific abuse.
Just recently, both Urfan and Beinash were found guilty of her murder after a lengthy trial. It’s heartbreaking to think about what she went through.
Now, the media has been pushing to reveal the judge’s name, but a ruling has come down that keeps it under wraps. This decision has raised eyebrows, especially since the court knew about Urfan’s history of violence.
Even though the press can attend hearings now, this ruling feels like a step back in terms of transparency. People are worried about how this affects public trust in the justice system.
Some advocates for victims’ rights are really concerned. They argue that knowing the judge’s name is crucial for accountability, especially in cases involving children.
Since 2010, Sara’s family had been on the radar of social services due to allegations of neglect and domestic violence. After her tragic death, there was talk of an independent review, but it’s been delayed because of the ongoing criminal case.
It’s a tough situation, and many are hoping for some answers and changes to prevent this from happening again.