What Trust Can We Place in the ‘Prevent’ Programme After Rudakubana’s Atrocity

Southport: The recent events have left many people shaken. Axel Rudakubana, despite multiple warnings, managed to commit a horrific act. He was flagged to the deradicalisation unit three times due to his violent interests, especially in school shootings. Yet, the Prevent programme decided he wasn’t a terrorist threat.

It’s baffling, right? He had a document titled “military studies in the jihad against the tyrants” and even made ricin. Still, authorities didn’t see him as a danger. This raises a lot of eyebrows. Why wasn’t he treated as a terrorist when he ended up killing three innocent girls?

The community is left with so many questions. How did he manage to get a taxi after being stopped by his dad from going to the school that expelled him? It’s a nightmare scenario. A public inquiry has been announced, and many hope it will shed light on these failures.

People are also concerned about the aftermath of the attack. There’s been a lot of talk about information being withheld from the public. It’s crucial for the police and government to be transparent about such serious matters.

If the Prevent programme can only deal with those who are openly extreme, it might be time for a serious rethink. The public deserves better protection and clarity on these issues.